Saturday, June 10, 2017

Chopping Down Trees


For months my writing has been reduced to adding things and checking off things from my TO DO LIST. Currently there are only 19 items on it, a record.

But if I am honest, the blogging hiatus has been due to more than my status quo of an always busy life.  It’s been several long months of pushing my way through my personal forest of old familiar foliage, and finally opening up new spaces for the sunlight to find its way through.

What is that like?

It's hacking away at some old dead trees, some of which I've been working on for years.  When they finally fall, sitting down on them for a while, staring off into nothing.  Then finally forcing myself to get up and try to roll them off the side of the hill to make space for new life. 

And pausing to look up at the now visible sky between the trees that I hadn’t noticed before.



Then figuring out what to plant next, and how to transplant new plants into the space left behind.  Figuring out how to make them live, how much water they need, and how not to kill them.

And when you have some brand new baby plants you aren’t even sure how to take care of yet, you prefer not draw too much attention to them, lest the curious or the critical come and trample the new life before it gets a fair start.  Hence the lack of communication.

My big dead trees included some surprising things. 

Church was one. Church with a little c.  Finally being willing to walk away from what was hurting me and leaving me empty over and over again without feeling guilty that I was abandoning God or His Church.  I still attend services, I have not forsaken the assembling together, but I no longer have membership, volunteering, being accepted, having a ministry title, and belonging to the club on the pedestal I’ve had it on my whole life.
 
The final breaking point was definitely the election as it unfolded in 2016 and its results.  Seeing so much of the church embrace and defend what so little resembled the true gospel was the final crack in the root of that tree in my life.  Going forward, my loyalty is to Jesus and his teachings, not to the Bible Belt political gospel.

The crash of that tree has opened up a clearing in my forest for many beautiful moments of having picnics in the open space. Finding and keeping like-minded friends from a variety of backgrounds and hearing God speak to me through their voices and lives without agenda has been both rich and healing.

Let me know if you want to come over to a picnic. :-)

Another big tree that was pretty dead already was complementarianism.  For several years now as a Christian, I have been reluctant to openly declare that I am a feminist and egalitarian, but I’m at the point that I feel it is the most honest and most Biblical place I can be.  I can respect my friends who are complementarian, but I would ask for the same respect in return.  I had already chopped down the tree of patriarchy quite some time ago which probably quite literally saved my life since it had me cornered in a cult (but that’s another story).

For those of you whose hackles raised at the mention of feminism, the dictionary definition of that oft misunderstood word is simply this: “the theory of the political, economic and social equality of the sexes.” That’s it. No bra burning, no male bashing, and nothing to be afraid of as a Jesus follower.  It is, in fact practically synonymous with Galatians 3:28 in the Bible: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for you are all one in Christ Jesus."

And for those of you wondering, yes, you can be pro-life and a feminist.  Check out the New Wave Feminists movement as proof.

Then there was tree that still had quite a bit of green in it that I didn’t realize needed to come down.  This was the tree of white privilege. Getting woke, as they say, has not been hard in the sense that I resisted, but hard in the sense that I had no idea how much I was missing all this time, right here in the USA.  Listening to my American brothers and sisters of color, beginning to understand more about past and current systemic racism in my country, seeing micro-aggressions as real and daily, and most of all, comprehending that, as hard as my life has been in many aspects, I have continually benefitted from white privilege over and over again and still do, has all been part of my waking up.

In the past I mistook being missional and having a degree of cultural awareness and competency for being woke.  I thought because I had been a missionary and lived as a foreigner overseas for six years that I got it. I thought because I had seen discrimination from the other side, understood the plight of the persecuted church, interacted with sensitivity and appreciation among other cultures, and comprehended the immensity of first world luxury that I was fully woke.

I was not.  I would still hesitate to claim I have fully awoken, but I am listening and learning how to be a better white ally to those in my own neighborhood.  That is a journey I am still on.  Sadly, I find it puts me even more out of step with many church folks and people in my conservative homeschooling circles who still deny both that their white privilege is real and that their brothers and sisters of color deal with racism daily.

But oh yes, the homeschooling!  That big lovely tree over there!  Two out of three of my children have graduated and one has two years left in high school.  I have to put in a disclaimer that our current version of homeschooling is my son taking all his subjects from tutors- he is with them in classes one a day week at a co-op, and does the work at home on the other days.  I am still the school principal and class monitor, but he is well on his way to fully independent study.

Happily for me, all three of my almost adult children are still living at home, and we get along decently well almost all of the time. While the specter of the empty nest looms it still somehow seems unreal and far away.

My midwifery practice is definitely one of the biggest trees in my woods, and this year I’m learning how to take on the role of administrator at the birthing center where I work.  It’s gratifying but not always comfortable, learning how to take care of things that need to get done without stressing myself out or driving everyone crazy.  Fortunately work has always been my happy place, and still is, even in my role as (sort of) boss.  There is nothing more redemptive than the labor of a woman and the birth of a baby, and as hard as it is to be a full time midwife, getting to share that miracle over and over again has been one of the most consistently bright places in my life so far.

Here’s one more reason why I feel my job is sacred- my role being compared to that of the Holy Spirit.

So with the three big trees of church idolatry, complementarianism and ignorance of white privilege and racism chopped down, I think I now have a nice open space in my woods to set up my desk, open my laptop and get back to regular blogging. 

Stay tuned!  And let me hear from you! Where are you in your journey, and what trees have you chopped down lately? Comments are open! 







Sunday, January 1, 2017

Vain Labor


Isaiah 49:4 is a verse I memorized at some point in the past. It has been going around in my mind lately as I ponder 2016, and my whole life in some respects. 

The first half…

Isaiah 49:4 NIV- “But I said, ‘I have labored in vain; I have spent my strength for nothing at all.’” 



Sometimes I feel like this is me.

NLT- “I replied, ‘But my work seems so useless!  I have spent my strength for nothing and to no purpose.’”

Getting the short end of the stick.

NET- “But I thought, ‘I have worked in vain; I have expended by energy for absolutely nothing.”

Wondering if all I’ve given out in my lifetime will ever pay off in something long term and tangible that I personally get to benefit from.

God’s Word Translation- “But I said: ‘I have worked hard for nothing.  I have used my strength but I didn’t accomplish anything.”

Often feeling unrewarded.

Today I went back to this place in the Bible, to read the context, to find the end of this story.  Turns out, Isaiah 49 is a Messianic chapter, describing the Messiah’s mission.  In other words, the “I” in this verse is actually Jesus speaking his feelings.

Yes, believe it or not, Jesus was feeling this.  Numerous commentaries back this up and expound on it:

Barns- “This is to be regarded as the language of the Messiah when his ministry would be attended with comparatively little success…The expression used here is not to be taken absolutely, as if He had no success in His work, but it means that he had comparatively no success; He was not received and welcomed by the united people; He was rejected and despised by them as a whole….it means than in His personal ministry He had exhausted His strength and seen comparatively little fruit of His toils.”

Gills- “…this is not to be understood of the travail of his soul, or of his sufferings and death, which were not in vain…but of his ministry and miracles, and fatiguing journeys among the Jews; which, with respect to them, were in vain, as to their conversation and reformation; they were rejecting the Messiah, slighting his doctrines and miracles, refusing to be gathered by him, being a faithless and perverse generation.”

Pulpit Commentary- “The Servant had momentarily desponded, seeing the small results of all his efforts to reclaim Israel, and had felt a natural human regret at so much labor apparently expended in vain…”

Trying to grasp that Jesus felt exactly the way I do.  That He, too, looked back over many years of miles He walked, prayers He prayed, people He poured into, hours of sharing his heart and being vulnerable with people, hard work He did, giving it all over and over, and momentarily wondered, “Was all that pain and sacrifice proportionate to the little bit of good that came out of it?”

I picture Jesus near the end of His ministry, standing on a hill a small distance away from His disciples sitting around the fire at night, watching them and listening to them talk and laugh, and feeling very tired, alone and discouraged.

To realize that these feelings I have were shared by Jesus, brings immeasurable comfort that I am not, indeed, at a dead end.  My feelings are real, and the place of grappling with disillusionment is also real.  But this is something normal that happens when we try to make a difference in the world, when we go out on a limb to not just look out for ourselves but invest in others. We will come to a place of wondering if the hard work and pain it cost us, and the lack and emptiness we now feel personally as a result, was worth the outcome.

But the reason for that may be because we invested largely in other peoples’ outcomes, not our own. We aren’t experiencing the fruits of our labors, they are.  So we feel empty because we have poured ourselves out, but there are other people in the world a little fuller because we did. 

The extent of our efforts may not fully be understood even by those we served, nor accurately measured in this lifetime. Those of us who try to be the most generous may look like we are coming in last.

But the end of the verse is our hope:

NIV- “ … Yet what is due me is in the Lord’s hand, and my reward is with my God.”

All that we have given, invested, sacrificed does count.  It may not count in immediate tangible numbers, but in the final accounting, it does and will.

NLT- “…Yet I leave it all in the Lord’s hand; I will trust God for my reward.”

There are many kinds of rewards.  Some include appreciation, respect, loyalty, promotion, good outcomes, and positive results. 

NET Bible- “…But the Lord will vindicate me; my God will reward me.”

Or maybe even financial renumeration.

God’s Word Translation- “…Yet, certainly my case is in the Lord’s hands, and my reward is with my God.”

But the reward we get from the very hand of God, either in this life, or the next, will trump all else. Our current status, our position and our bank account balances are not the final indication of our effectiveness.

Barns- “…This expresses the confidence of the speaker, that God approved of his work and that He would ultimately give such effort to His labors as he had desired.  The sense is, ‘I know that Jehovah approves my work, and that He will grant me the reward of my toils, and my sufferings.  The idea is that he knew that God would own and accept His work through it was rejected by mankind.  It indicates perfect confidence in God, and a calm and unwavering assurance of His favor, though His work was comparatively unsuccessful- a spirit which, it is needless to say, was evinced throughout the whole life of the Redeemer.”

My 2017 prayer for myself and for my friends who feel the way I do is that we, like Jesus, will have a calm and unwavering assurance of God’s favor, regardless of all the things that haven’t worked out for us, even when we did our best to do the right thing.

And that we will learn to look to Him for our reward.

ISV- "I said, 'I've labored for nothing.  I've exhausted my strength on futility and on emptiness.' Yet surely my recompense is with the Lord, and my reward is with my God."






Sunday, October 23, 2016

Letter to the Author

Excuse me, Author.  Yes, you with the keyboard.  


This your character, your protagonist.  Can we talk?  I mean, I know you are in the middle of writing my story and all, but I was wondering if we could make it a little more personal for a minute.

I know what they tell you in those writer’s conferences: “Create the best possible characters and then do the worst possible things to them.”  Is that what is going on here?   I’m just wondering. Because half of that statement is flattering and half of it is terrifying, just saying.  

I’m also curious, is my story plot driven or character driven?  Is this about the events happening around me or is this about me and how I will change and grow through the course of my story?  ‘Cause an awful lot of things have happened in my story so far, but I’ve also changed a lot- so I wasn’t exactly sure.

Anyway, I wonder if it would be possible to make a couple of special requests. 

As you are so amazingly creative, I’m sure you could find another plot device other than depression to make my character relatable.  I mean, I see what you are doing there, and I know lots of your readers can relate to depression, but, maybe you could find something else?  Not another disease though.   I’m sure you can think of something. 

Also, I’m a little concerned because I know that things going normally and smoothly will generally make for boring reading, but I’ll bet you could write so well as to make an exception to that rule.  I’d like this trend to last for more than one chapter.  I seriously don’t want the plot to get any more conflicted or exciting now that you’ve resolved some of the previous conflicts you introduced earlier on.  You could start a new trend in literature.  You know, like the way people watch those webcams in eagle’s nests where nothing goes on for hours and days and then finally a baby eagle pecks its way out and the parent feeds it and in the next few weeks it gradually and predictably grows up and flies away and everyone is enthralled.   The rest of my story could be like that.

Seriously, you really should consider not introducing more conflict or this story won’t be believable.  Your readers will get skeptical.  They will start saying, no way, this much crap could never happen to one person- this is totally unrealistic.  And you wouldn’t want that. 

I’ll tell you what I would like.  Just a suggestion, mind you, but this could be the point in the story where my character gets out of denial, looks down at how much weight she is gaining, admits that those pounds are starting to make her physically uncomfortable, and gets off the couch and does something about it before it is too late.  She could even get real intense about it and start working out, juicing, yoga, the works, and reinvent herself into some kind of middle-aged super diva, like Barbara Streisand in The Mirror Has Two Faces.

Also, you could pull some kind of positive surprise twist where the small business she buys suddenly takes off and makes a boat load of money, more than she ever expected, and she has money to invest.  That could open up all kinds of possibilities for the rest of the book. 

(I’m not trying to do your job here, just give you some ideas in case you were having writer’s block or something.)

Am also making an important request not to make my character’s kids do anything dramatic or crazy to move the plot along.  You can give them their own book if you want to do that kind of thing, but in this story they should be pleasing two-dimensional support characters who do not get into any trouble whatsoever, if you please.

Okay, thank you for taking the time to listen to me and to consider my requests.  I mean, I know you are in my head with my thoughts and my POV all the time, but I just wanted it to be more direct for a change.   Hope you don’t think I’m out of line here, you know, like a pot asking the potter why he made it a certain way.  I just felt that we were close enough to risk it.  I may be wrong, but I kind of get the idea you like me, so I thought I would take a chance to tell you how I was feeling.

But of course, you already knew, didn’t you?

Of course you did.

Because I’m your character.  You dreamed me up, and wrote me from your imagination.  You selected my strengths and chose my flaws. There is not a word in my mouth that you did not write, nor a thought in my head that did not flow from your character sketch of me.  My life is your story board, and you know my beginning and my end.  You fully control my plot line and each minute detail from the opening sentence to the closing chapter.  Before you began my story you decided the theme and the setting, and drew my outline. You planned the trajectory of my internal and external conflict and how that would develop my character.  You know exactly how many words my book contains and how it will finish.

So, I know you actually took this request of mine into consideration before I made it, and I can trust you with my story.

Come to think of it, You can just keep writing.







Friday, October 21, 2016

It Was Really About Women, not Trump or Clinton


One week ago I wrote an open letter to Dr. James Dobson and posted it on my blog.

Then the next day there was some kind of a rare hunter's super moon, and all the women in my care tried to go into labor at the same time. Off I went to deliver babies for several nights in a row. When I checked back on my blog, I saw it had kind of blown up- 113,000 views and over 100 comments and counting. Certainly a record for my corner of the internet, definitely indicating I hit a nerve or two. The numbers were frankly terrifying. However one thing I noticed is that at least half of the people commenting and probably also reading completely missed my point.

Some people thought I wrote my blog to (just) to rant on Trump. (I didn't.) Some people thought I was saying Clinton isn't as bad as Trump (I wasn't), and was therefore indirectly supporting her (I don't). Some people thought it was hypocritical to point out Trump's ("minor") faults and not mention any of Clinton's ("major") ones. Some people thought I didn't care about unborn babies because I didn't mention them. (I do, deeply.)  That just wasn't what I was blogging about that day.

If I had been writing a political blog about Trump versus Clinton, some of this criticism might have had some merit, but I actually wasn't.  I also wasn't writing to campaign for anyone.

I wrote an open letter and addressed one Christian leader directly. In so doing, I was also attempting to address more broadly Christian leaders and their attitudes toward men's moral behavior, the treatment of women, and issues of abuse and sexual assault. 

Oh, you say, is that all?  Dirty talk versus real politics and the fate of the nation?  Get over it.  Those women are all probably lying anyway.

Except it is hard to get over something all us women live with. Almost every woman alive has a story.  You would be hard pressed to find a single woman on this planet who hasn't been cat-called, addressed disrespectfully, propositioned, stalked, groped, had inappropriate sexual advances made to her, or been sexually assaulted or abused in some way in her lifetime. 

Along with that experience, the majority of those women have a correlating, equally devastating experience.  Their sexual harassment or assault or abuse was minimized or denied. The women were told no one would believe them, or, they were accused of exaggerating, lying, or having less than pure motives in reporting what happened to them.  In extreme cases they were totally shunned or excommunicated from their families as well.

Sadly, the odds of both experiences are exponentially higher if they were Christians or in a religious setting.

My first experience happened at a Christian radio station where I worked when I was 19.  One night when I was by myself recording commercials, the lead Christian DJ (who was married) entered the studio, came up behind me without warning and put his hands on my breasts.  I pushed him away and ran out into the foyer- he followed hastily and apologized before I left.  When I asked my mom and step-dad if I should say anything to the boss, I was told it would be my word against his since there were just the two of us there, and people would probably believe him instead of me, and it would hurt my reputation.  And after all, "nothing really happened," so I was advised not to tell anyone. When I tried to confront the DJ later about his behavior, he became very condescending and said the real issue in the situation seemed to be mine since I couldn't forgive him.

Abusers who know the Bible love to misuse our command from Jesus to forgive and twist it into a manipulation against truth, confrontation and consequences.

So I didn't tell anyone at the station, and put in my resignation. And for a very long time I freaked out when anyone came up behind me. Although I never deliberately tuned into that station again, it was the only Christian station in our area so I would frequently have to hear this man's voice over the air for years to come.

Fast forward many years to my marriage when my husband and I were finally in counselling after several years and I was trying to talk about abuse, my fears, and what was happening to me on a daily basis.  I was told things by pastors like, "You also have issues you need to work on- there are two sides to this you know." "You are over-reacting," and  "You aren't really in danger, he just needs anger management." 

One night I was so scared I ran out of our apartment and went to a co-worker's home to call our pastor.  The co-worker and his wife were home and let me in to use the phone...and then when my husband showed up furious looking for me, they left me there alone with him.  I will never forget what my young co-worker said as he turned around and looked at me before he left.  "Roxanne, I'm sorry, but your husband is my boss.  I'm going to let you guys work this out."  The pastor I called told me to go home and say sorry and make up with him.  I eventually did.  It was very a bad night.

Those are some of my stories of groping and abuse being minimized, but many other people's are much worse.

There have been many high profile sexual scandal and marital abuse issues in the media, but the ones by Christians are particularly painful.  Whether it is Bill Gothard, or Josh Dugger or Doug Philips one thing you will see in common is that some public opinion almost always turns viciously against the women involved. Particularly notable is what happened when Naghmeh the wife of the high profile Iranian Christian pastor Saeed Abedini came forward at the time of his release from prison, seeking protection for herself and her children through legal separation. Under great psychological and emotional distress, Naghmeh made a simple personal statement to supporters by email and said Saeed had a pornography addiction and had abused her for years emotionally, physically and sexually. For her agonizing honesty expressed privately, she got raked publicly over the coals by the Christian community and her abuse dismissed publicly by Franklin Graham:

"Not everything that has been reported in the media is true," Franklin posted on Facebook.  "While we rejoice at his new freedom, we now lift him and his wife Naghmeh to the Lord for healing in their marriage. Other than God, no one knows the details and the truth of what has happened between Saeed and Naghmeh except them. There's an old saying that there are at least two sides to every story." 

This is Christian-speak for "don't believe everything his wife Naghmeh has said." There were, by the way, no other "media reports" being circulated in their case he could have been referring to. 

The attitudes of Christian leaders toward the women who have been assaulted or abused remains largely the same as it does in non-religious settings, if not worse. Women are just as regularly suspected of not telling the truth, of exaggerating, or of having ulterior motives. Their experiences are often minimized and dismissed as inconsequential.  

In Christian circles instead of being defended, comforted, supported and protected, if women are actually believed, they are told they "must forgive," and the abuser is often let off the hook as long as he "says sorry". Married women are encouraged to stand by their man and move on for the sake of the larger issues- "not letting the devil destroy their marriage" their children, their witness, or their ministry. Single women who are molested are often shamed and the focus goes to what they were wearing or how they were acting or if they behaved inappropriately.

I will never forget where I was when one of my male relatives asked me, "just what was it" that my husband did that I would divorce him.  When I replied that he was a sexual addict, addicted to pornography, abusive, and had been cheating on me for our whole marriage, his reply was, "That's it?"

This was the attitude I was confronting in James Dobson in his support of Trump. This attitude which is widespread in the church that minimizes the moral character failings of men and the pain of the women who suffer from them.  This is the attitude that looks for ways to dismiss reports of inappropriate sexual behavior by men with statements like,  "It was a long time ago."  "He said sorry." "He has repented." "Judge not lest you be judged."  "Nobody is perfect."  "After all David committed adultery and he was a man after God's own heart." "It was just talk."  "She's probably lying." "You have to forgive." "Two sides to every story." "It's a conspiracy." 

These are not new or unique statements from Trump supporters in this election.  These are statements that Christians and others have been making, and abused and molested women have been hearing over and over for a long, long time. And when they hear those statements now defending Trump, particularly by Christians who say they stand for morals, they are wounded all over again.

This, in spite of how we are supposed to be the "moral majority" and stand up for Biblical values in our culture. But if we can't even stand up for truth and morality among ourselves in our churches, for everyone including women and yes, I haven't forgotten, our precious unborn babies too, but the women are the ones who have the babies so let's start there shall we? then how are we supposed to be the moral compass of our nation?

Standing up for morality isn't sweeping reports of abuse under the carpet, nor is it blaming the victim, nor is it "praying for the marriage" when we should be helping the woman get out of an abusive situation, nor is it ignoring or minimizing reports spousal abuse or sexual misconduct by those who are in leadership in churches.

Or in those who are running for president.

One voice among prominent conservative Christian leaders has notably stood against Trump from the beginning.  Max Lucado, all the way back in February wrote a piece called "Decency for President."  In it he wrote about his test for someone dating his daughter.  He had to be "decent."  He raised concerns about how Trump behaved toward women and made the connection- the way a man treats women says volumes about his character in other areas.  And then he concluded,

"I have no inside track on the intricacies of a presidential campaign. I’m a pastor. I don’t endorse candidates or place bumper stickers on my car. But I am protective of the Christian faith...."


This is where I was coming from with my letter to Dr. Dobson. Like Max Lucado, I have no inside track on the intricacies of politics and my intent last week - believe it or not- actually wasn't to write a political blog.  But I am protective of the Christian faith. I care about what goes on in the church, for we are supposed to represent Jesus. And I believe our values should be consistent with our faith.  If we say we stand for character and morality, (as James Dobson spent a lifetime publicly doing) then let's consistently stand for character and morality and be that moral compass.

Christians, our first citizenship is in the Kingdom of God, and we will have that Kingdom intact in our hearts no matter who becomes president in our country of residence.  So let's see that we reflect the attitudes of our King in the way we are respecting and standing up for people among ourselves first, including women and yes unborn babies, and those who report abuse and sexual assault (who I should add, are not always women).  We can start by taking what they have been through seriously, and by not giving their abusers a free pass.

Let's live the values we say we believe.  We have one vote on one day for this election, but then we will have 1,460 days to live until the next election.  If we were as passionate about living our Christian values every one of those days...

If we love our neighbors as we love ourselves,

If we do unto others as we want them to do to us,

If we treat women - and all people- the way Jesus did, and stand up for victims,

If we stick to all these Biblical values personally and in that way hold up that standard to our culture, we win, no matter who is elected.

As for me personally, I've recently made the decision to vote for Evan McMullin.  I will be posting support for him on my social media, and encouraging others to consider him as a choice.  But at the end of the day, no matter who is voted president, I will commit to pray daily for that individual. Because if I say I stand for Biblical values, I have to live them, not just vote for them, although the goal is to make those two things as consistent as possible.

So the point of my original blog wasn't (only) how evil Trump was, nor was I implying he was necessarily a worse choice for president than Clinton.  I was instead, attempting to be a voice for women who have been abused, and to tell you how they, we, I feel when James Dobson, or any of you defend Trump, a man who reminds many of us of our abuser.


























Friday, October 14, 2016

A Letter to Dr. James Dobson



Dear Dr Dobson,

You don’t know me.  But I am one of millions that you have influenced.  I always looked up to you, and you, through your books, gave me advice that may have saved my life.  I’ll tell you more about that later.

My mother read your books too and all your early titles were a part of our family library.  I listened to Focus on the Family growing up.  Your organization was our family's and our faith community’s favorite resource- your voice was trusted and familiar when we heard it on the radio, year after year.  In a way, your strong kind voice was a substitute for the dad I never really had.

Then I got married.  And some things went very wrong, and I didn’t know why, and I couldn’t talk about it to the people around me.  I eventually found out why- my husband was addicted to pornography.  But we were in full time ministry and he was in leadership, and there was no one who would believe me, or be on my side.  So, I turned to who I knew I could trust- Focus on the Family.  You were the only Christian voice I had ever heard that was regularly open and passionate and clear about the dangerous of pornography- so I knew I could turn to your organization for help and I wouldn’t be blown off nor my situation minimized.

And Focus on the Family had resources for me.  Referrals to counselors and support groups to help me know what to do now that I had found out my husband had been viewing pornography.   Books to read to help me understand, like, An Affair of the Mind.  And one very important one, written by you personally –Love Must be Tough. I ordered them and read them through my tears.

Due to a horrible coincidence of my dad dying unexpectedly, I had a few days away from my husband soon after I found out the truth that he was a sexual addict.  I took a week to cry, read books,find out as much as I could, pray, get advice, and try to figure out what to do.  In your book Love Must Be Tough, I found many of the answers I needed.  It was the first place I read such clear advice such as, if you husband has an affair and you want to forgive him and stay in the marriage, tell him you will only do it once, and if he ever does it again, you are getting a divorce.  And then be willing to do it.  You made it clear that he couldn’t be given a free pass to keep cheating with no consequences.  Your book also said it was always okay to leave if I wasn't safe.

I desperately needed to hear that. Your book may have actually saved my life, because it helped me see right and wrong more clearly and not compromise so I was eventually able to get out of a dangerous situation.

You see, Dr. Dobson, no one else at the time in the Christian community was speaking out that strongly against pornography, or discussing affairs and abuse and how to handle these things.  All the Christian around me were minimizing what my husband had done, and emphasizing that I must forgive him.  Everyone was saying it was in the past, and I should think of the future of our marriage and our kids.  Everyone but you. You didn’t pull any punches.  Your writings and advice were pro-marriage, but not at any cost, and you did not advocate wives staying in abusive relationships- a radical deviation from the advice I got from most Christians.

You didn’t over spiritualize the way many Christians did.  You were the one who interviewed the serial murderer and rapist Ted Bundy on death row who said that looking at pornography was the gateway to all of his violent crimes.  It was this interview that fueled your crusade against pornography and you called it what it was- dangerous.  Not something all men looked at in locker rooms and kept under their beds.  No boys will be boys or men will be men excuses from you.  Your uncompromising stand gave both me and women like me hope and strength to stand up as well.

Dr. Dobson, after battling all your life against the evil of pornography, after your clarion call to America that pornography destroys intimacy, marriages, families and souls, are you going to vote for a man who (among many other moral failures) has a lifetime of openly participating in this kind evil and promoting it? 

You, who were on the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography in the 1980s and were part of publishing a 1,960 page report on every aspect of this evil and its effect on our culture?


Trump opened the country's first in-casino strip club inside Trump Taj Mahal (where no doubt many things happened that destroyed many families). Trump gave interviews for Playboy magazine and actually stared as himself in a porn film. Trump said of the owner of Playboy: “Hugh Hefner really understood the art of using mass media, better than anybody else of his generation. He did something that really has been done very rarely — he made himself the company, in terms of his image. And it's been a huge asset for Playboy. It's really become such an amazing brand."

This is not the kind of man you usually support. 

In 2008 you went on record and said you wouldn’t vote for Republican John McCain as a matter of conscious. Your reasons?  Among others you said adultery, ethics, violent temper, profane behavior, and his acceptance of gambling and alcohol money.

Here is what you said then, “The Senator is being touted by the media as a man of principle, yet he was involved with other women while married to his first wife, and was implicated in the so-called Keating scandal with four other senators.  He was eventually reprimanded by the Congress for the ‘appearance of impropriety.’ The Senator reportedly has a violent temper and can be extremely confrontational and profane when angry.  These red flags about Senator McCain’s character are reminiscent of the man who now occupies the White House.”

Dr. Dobson, you felt pretty strongly about McCain’s character and you weren’t afraid to say so and apparently to abstain from voting even though he was the Republican Party candidate. There were some similarities to the current election. In spite of his short comings, McCain was pro-life, and Obama wasn’t.  But in that election you didn’t say of McCain, “these are misdeeds in his past” or “let him who is without sin cast the first stone,” You didn’t suggest we should forgive McCain for the sake of our party getting into the White House and for the sake of our important pro-life cause, or the future of our country.

(Actually, I find out, you more or less did.  Other readers, see correction footnote at the end of the blog.)

So let’s hold Trump up to this same standard you held McCain. Trump also committed adultery with other women while married to his previous two wives. Trump also “reportedly has a violent temper and can be extremely confrontational and profane when angry” – we have seen many examples of this during his campaign alone, not even counting previous to that.  You said just a couple of days ago, "To my knowledge, Donald Trump has never abused women physically or had oral sex in the Oval Office with a vulnerable intern.”

Well, he hasn’t gotten to the oval office yet, but he’s obviously exactly the kind of man would who abuse women physically and have oral sex or some other kind of sex with a vulnerable intern when he does get there- or maybe he would “just” grab her genitals and try to kiss her.  This is a man who has publicly bragged about his sex life for years on the radio with air trash talk with radio shock jock Howard Stern:

“You could’ve gotten her, right?” Stern asked Trump on-air shortly after Princess Diana’s death in 1997. “You could’ve nailed her.”
“I think I could have,” Trump said.
How about singer Mariah Carey? “Would you bang her?” Stern asked. Trump replied, “I would do it without hesitation.”

Or maybe you prefer to believe what Trump said that time when Stern asked him,

“Is oral sex important to you? Man to man, and I’ve had this discussion with many men.”
Trump: “No, it’s not important to me.”

We have on tape evidence that he is a sexual predator and that he forces unwilling women to accept his advances. And many women continue to come forward confirming this is a regular pattern, and behavior not just talk. 

Dr. Dobson, you are the one who taught me through your radio shows and writings on marriage not to naively believe empty words, nor promises, but to look for changed behavior before trust is given.  

I don’t see the changed behavior.  I see no evidence that Trump is any different than the man who did all these things consistently for most of his life.  And isn’t it pretty logical to look carefully at the whole history of a person before electing them?  Why does Trump get the “forgive and forget” pass when it has never been issued before by us conservatives?  What else can we use to make a determination on what a person will do in the future, except his personal history?
   
If you could abstain from voting in a previous election because you felt there were no good choices, it seems to me you could do it again, and I would be so bold as to suggest it is even truer now than it was then.

(Or you could flip-flop, see update.)

And Dr. Dobson, with all due respect, you did take the Bible out of context.  You said, "I do not condone nor defend Donald Trump's terrible comments made 11 years ago. They are indefensible and awful. I'm sure there are other misdeeds in his past, although as Jesus said, 'Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.' "

In the scripture you referenced, (John 8) Jesus was not defending from stones a man like Trump who had forced himself upon women and made statements just one year ago that he had never asked God for forgiveness.  He was defending a woman on her face in the dirt in shame and repentance before Him, who was a victim OF men like Trump who had thrown her there and were attacking her out of their own self-righteousness and political agendas.

And once more for the record, Dr. Dobson, they are not just comments. They represent a lifetime of behavior.  

You used to be a defender, Dr. Dobson. You defended women like me and families like mine and said that pornography and immorality would destroy us, and we could take a stand against it, and not tolerate it in any form.  You defended women like me and said we deserved to be treated with respect and dignity.

But now you are willing to put a man in the White House who has spent a lifetime not just looking at pornography and practicing immorality but promoting it, who repeatedly brags about “banging women”, repeatedly brags about how many women he has slept with, repeatedly brags about sex outside of marriage, and even brags about being a sexual predator.  He rates women’s value by the size of their body parts. He says pumping breastmilk is disgusting and pregnancy is inconvenient to employers.   

In short, he has spent his entire lifetime trampling on the family values you have fought for Dr. Dobson, and he has done it consistently, openly and unapologetically.

Dr. Dobson, you are now aligning yourself with a man who victimizes instead speaking up for his victims.  By your vote, you are supporting the very behaviors that caused me immeasurable pain and ultimately, the destruction of my family.  It feels to me like you have switched sides, and now are part of a political system that considers women and their pain collateral damage to a bigger agenda.

Dr. Dobson, I’m challenging you- would you trust your daughter Danae in an elevator alone with Mr. Trump?  If not, then how can you send him to the White House where he will have that kind of access and power over many, many women in that situation?  Can you look them in the eye?


How about you, Dr. Dobson?  Can you vote for Trump and look your wife and daughter and all of us in the eye?  How about the victims of sexual violence?  And the victims of pornography?

I can’t tell you how disappointed many of us are that you didn’t stand up for women this time. You threw us all under the bus for the sake of a candidate who pays lip service to being pro-life (though he was pro-choice not long ago) and might possibly make better nominations to the Supreme Court. His lack of morals and any victims of that immorality are just collateral damage to a more important agenda - "the future of this nation."

It’s as if you personally are standing there, watching Trump grope all of us and grab our body parts and try to force himself on us and you turn a blind eye and pretend you don’t see because what really matters is that he agreed to vote pro-life and appoint a conservative Supreme Court justice and because Hillary is evil.

That’s how it feels as a woman to hear men say after we are humiliated, assaulted, raped or cheated on, “Sure that was awful what he did, but there are worse things, and anyway we should forgive because we are Christians,” (And I’m not the only one to feel that way, apparently Beth Moore does too.)

This is the message you personally are sending the every single victim of sexual violence when as a Christian leader you support Trump instead of condemning him- that what happened to them isn’t that bad.  We don’t hear you sending the message that Hillary is worse and the future of our country is at stake.  We hear the message that being a sexual predator doesn’t disqualify a man from being president… that what happened to us isn’t criminal, just “terrible.”  

What about being “pro-life” for our lives?  What about justice for us?  What about the evil of minimizing this kind of treatment of women?  What about our future and the future of our daughters in a country where the president has set an example that insulting, exploiting, harassing and assaulting women is okay?  Isn't that a threat to the future of this nation as well?

Because make no mistake, Dr. Dobson, when you can listen to that tape that was released, when you can read all these things I’ve mentioned about the way Trump treats women, talks about women, disrespects women, and sexually assaults women, and say you will still vote for him, you ARE minimizing and condoning this behavior.   You can say all you like that his comments are “indefensible and awful”, but apparently they- and the behavior they described- aren’t bad enough to withhold a vote when something “bigger” is at stake.

Furthermore the way a man treats women says a lot about his character in other areas Dr. Dobson, and I think you know that.  The editorial in the Deseret newspaper said it well.  “What oozes from this audio is evil. We hear a married man give smooth, smug and self-congratulatory permission to his intense impulses, allowing them to outweigh the most modest sense of decency, fidelity and commitment. And although it speaks volumes about sexual morality, it goes to the heart of all ethical behavior. Trump’s banter belies a willingness to use and discard other human beings at will. That characteristic is the essence of a despot.”

I suspect you may find what you lost with this endorsement is much greater than what you gained, for you have lost your reputation as a man of discernment and character and consistency who champions family values without agenda and who stands up against injustice.

You said in 2010, “We are in a moral decline of shocking dimensions. I have asked myself how I can I sit and watch the world go by without trying to help if I can. That is what motivates me at this time.”

I wish you had just watched; it would have been better than this.
We are indeed in a moral decline when you, James Dobson, the champion of family values are voting for a candidate who has no family values or morals at all. For me, this is one of the greatest losses of the election so far.  I expected nothing from Trump, but that he would be who he has always been. 

But I expected that you would do the same, Dr. Dobson- that you would be who you had always been- a man who stands up for values- and stands up for us. 

I was wrong.


10/15/16 Update:

One of my more politically astute friends pointed something out to me that bears updating.

The quote I posted about Dr. Dobson not voting for John McCain was originally spoken early in 2000 and he stuck to that for quite a while saying he would not vote for McCain under any circumstances. But in August of 2006 Dr. Dobson actually changed his mind and decided to come out in support of McCain  “If flip-flopping is a sin, then I am a sinner," he said.

On the one hand, it now makes sense why it was easier for Dr. Dobson to support Trump in this election, another immoral man he doesn't approve of. On the other hand, it gives me real hope that once again, Dr. Dobson might consider "flip-flopping", only this time the other way.  He is obviously willing to change a public position when convicted to do so.

What about it, Dr. Dobson?  How about flip-flopping on your support of Trump and sending a message that you do care about how women are treated?  You wouldn't be the only Christian leader to honorably flip-flop. Wayne Grudem, prominent evangelical theologian, recently did just that.  

Your position in supporting Trump has added much ammunition to the lie that Christians don't really care about values or women, just power.

Would you like to prove them wrong?