Why What Happened in the Bill Gothard Movement Matters Part 2 (And How Becoming a Midwife Temporarily Saved Me From It)
Since I
wrote Part 1, I’ve been a little surprised at the number of visitors to my
little blog. There are many other
websites that provide a more wide spread and comprehensive forum for ATI
survivors to share their journeys. What
seems to have struck a chord was how much the doctrine that came through Bill
Gothard’s Basic and Advanced Seminars and the ATI curriculum spread and affected
those who were not an actual part of the movement, like myself.
The
homeschool movement itself has been a huge current into which many branches
have fallen and affected those of us who were swimming in the river. While homeschooling itself was just an
educational choice, those who chose it were often more “extreme-conservative” in
their lifestyle choices, and that very much flavored the whole stream for a
very long time. IBLP and ATI were two of
the biggest branches that were log-jamming the whole thing.
This is why
at homeschool book fairs it became common to see a large majority of
young people and their parents dressed in jumpers and button down oxford
shirts. This might be because they were ATI , or it might be because they were
influenced by the general current philosophy that flavored the stream that
Christian home education, traditional roles in the home and more traditional
dress (women wearing skirts and dresses exclusively) were a package deal. Booths at these fairs might include a large
one from ATI, Vision Forum, Above
Rubies, and multiple other small ones with everything from dress patterns, to coming
of age and courtship books, to cookbooks, that fit into the conservative
healthy lifestyle. Even the images and illustrations in so much of the Christian curriculum on display (Rod and Staff, Christian Liberty Press) would show women dressed very conservatively, children obediently smiling, and everyone in traditional roles - to the point that these things were all melded in our minds as indistinguishable.
So, back to
my story, which is really the only one in which I can to speak with any kind of
authority, and why I am telling it. My motive in sharing it is
that it may help others on their own road of sorting and healing.
My family and I jumped into that off-mainstream-road
into the homeschooling-stream in 1981, when I was 11 years old. It was not the typical diving board. I had
been doing fairly well going to public school in our small town, but then when
I hit 5th grade I had a slightly imbalanced male teacher who would
occasionally get verbally and sometimes even physically abusive with the kids
in the class, besides not doing a very good job of teaching. My mom was furious, couldn’t get support from
the other parents to get him removed, and finally decided it was easier just to
take me out. She didn’t know anyone who
was currently homeschooling, but had read about it in an article sent to her by
her sister about the humanism coming into public schools (mainly the teaching
of evolution) and how to help your kids navigate it. In the final paragraph there was a brief mention
of home schooling as an option.
(You will notice
I keep mentioning my mom but not my dad.
My dad was a dysfunctional alcoholic mostly absent parent who had very
little influence over me at this point. What I didn’t realize about my mother at
the time was that along with an on-going battle with depression she also had
borderline personality disorder. This
causes a person to see situations and people as either all bad or all good,
nothing in between. Hence her quick jump
to all-bad public school= we must homeschool. )
My mom latched
on to that idea, ordered some Abeka books from Christian Liberty Academy (because
that was one of the few companies providing curriculum at the time- Bill
Gothard had not started ATI yet), and bam, we were homeschoolers. My only sibling was a brother, six years
younger and autistic, who had only gone to a church kindergarten, so she
started him in first grade.
A key part
of my story is that at this point my family was not ultra conservative nor
legalistic. In fact we were enjoying some positive fruits of freedom from the
Jesus movement that surged throughout the 70s and influenced the way we lived
as Christians. We went to a healthy
non-demoninational evangelical church, attended women’s Aglow meetings,
listened to enthusiastic bearded guitar playing Christian artists like Don
Francisco, came up to Dallas to hear speakers at Christ for the Nations, and
read the Last Days Ministry newsletter from Keith Green. Other than the fact
that my mom was strict about TV and kept me on a steady diet of PBS shows like
Mr. Rodgers and Sesame Street instead of letting me watch the Dukes of Hazard, Happy
Days and Saturday morning cartoons, I was kind of a normal late70s early 80s
kid who dressed and ate and watched and read somewhat consistently with my time
period in America.
And then
homeschooling changed all that. When we
jumped into the stream my mom picked up various bits of flotsam that she
adapted to her fancy. We weren’t nearly
as specifically legalistic as the ATI family mold, but my mom soon developed
her own quirky version as we floated along.
Clothing,
for example. We didn’t go all exclusive
dresses for gals, and I never heard the term “eye trap,” but it was decided
that pants with zippers were “men’s clothing.”
By the time I was 13 (1982) I had to find pants and jeans without
zippers. Anybody want to guess how hard
that was? Also the pants were carefully scrutinized
not to be too tight (Mom’s definition: showing any curve from my seat down the
back of my leg), so I was usually forced to buy at least a size bigger than necessary. Swimsuits usually had to be specially made
for me and resembled more of a mini dress.
Food, for
another thing. My mother read the book
Sugar Blues by William Duffy (published 1975) around the time she was pulling
me out of public school. It was actually
quite ground breaking and gave her some excellent dietary keys to helping my
brother’s hyperactivity that were way ahead of the curve. Unfortunately, not eating sugar and white
flour quickly became, not just a healthy lifestyle choice, but one more sign
that we were more spiritual that the people still eating sugar because our
bodies were temples of the Holy Spirit and we were keeping ours cleaner than
theirs.
These were
relatively minor -although not at all minor in my teenaged mind- I didn’t want to
dress provocatively, just be like everyone else- wear jeans and eat candy bars-
uh huh, gotcha! - that was exactly what I was NOT supposed to want, you know. But minor compared
to the stronger previously mentioned mandates in Part 1 that quickly crept in and
instructed me not to have dreams for myself beyond getting married
and having kids. No jobs. No dating. No
college. No goals. (What do you think? Was the individualized legalism my mother developed for me any less quirky and random than the laws developed for the ATI students? I thought this post was one of the best I have ever read at pointing out the inconsistencies, and it helped me more clearly see the ones in my story as well:
http://homeschoolersanonymous.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/the-many-valuable-lessons-i-learned-in-ati-lauras-story/
Did your family develop random extra-Biblical or inconsistent legalistic rules for you to follow that affected you?)
This is where I would like to make another important point. Remember I mentioned that my mother had chronic struggles with depression and had borderline personality disorder. It wasn’t until much, much later in my adult years that I realized she picked both lifestyle and doctrine that matched her dysfunction.
Her
borderline personality did well with the “us and them” mentality that existed between
homeschoolers and public schoolers in the 1980s, and well into the 90s. In general, Christian homeschoolers espoused that if
you were a real Christian who cared about your kids getting raised right and
turning out right, you had to homeschool, because public school would
absolutely ruin your kids and destroy all the traditional values you
worked so hard to put into them. Christians who had their kids in public school
generally thought the homeschooling parents were weird and overprotective and
their kids would turn out to be un-socialized misfits. Needless to say, their kids didn’t hang out
together much. This was a mentality greatly fostered in ATI as well, I noticed- you either were, or you weren't, in or out, a good ATI Christian or a not that great worldly one.
As I
mentioned in part 1, I think the majority of Christian parents choose
homeschooling for the right reasons. But
there was a significant minority of parents who choose homeschooling, and
perhaps also ATI, because it fit in with an already present co-dependent or
dysfunctional lifestyles or unhealthy emotional tendencies. I think depending on the day, my mother could
have been in either category.
However as I
got older, it was more in the dysfunctional category. I was not allowed to have opinions that
differed from hers without being labeled rebellious. This came both from the
growing submission to parents teaching in the stream and her BPD which
interprets all disagreement as betrayal.
My father’s
drinking worsened, and he began to get more and more violent, sometimes coming
home in a drunken rage and throwing knives around in the kitchen. (He had already been unfaithful many times.) My mother, worried about our safety, took my
brother and me and moved out when I was 14, hoping it would cause my dad to get
help. He didn’t. The divorce was final
two years later. (For the record, I’m
glad whatever she was reading at the time didn’t tell her to stay and submit to
that.) However we were never allowed to talk about what happened in front of
other people– I’m not sure how much of that was shame, how much was control, or
how much of that reminded my mother we weren’t the perfect Christian family she
still somehow tried to keep up the appearances of.
In the
meantime, we kept homeschooling. By the
age of 15 I tested out of all my curriculum and received an Alpha Omega high
school diploma of completion.
So now
what? I was interested in midwifery, but
deemed (rightly) too young to start an apprenticeship. I started helping a lady
in my church clean houses for money. (I
brought the money home to the family.)That job was deemed acceptable since it
was in homes. Then I got a temporary
office job with a doctor in my church. (I
brought the money home to the family.) That job was deemed acceptable because
it was with someone from the church.
Then I got a job at a grocery store. (I brought the money home to the
family.) That job was deemed acceptable because God gave it to me.
Because I
was simply grateful to be let out of the house, I didn’t realize that I was
experiencing evidence that exceptions could be made to “women shouldn’t work
outside the home” rule when it was convenient to do so. As with many laws made by man, the ones in my
home could also be reinterpreted by man when there was a necessary end to a
certain means. (I’ve seen the same
pattern in some of the testimonies from those recovering from ATI, particularly those who worked at headquarters.) My mother
did not choose to reinterpret it for herself however. She stayed home and homeschooled my brother.
The dating
one was not reinterpreted though. That
one was unchangeable. And I thoroughly internalized
that one, and kept it as one of the Ten Commandments, believing that it would ensure
me the happy marriage of my dreams, and not a broken one like my parents had. My mother had nothing to worry about on that
count.
When I was
18, I was allowed to start a midwifery apprenticeship. This involved moving out of my mother’s home into
the birthing center where I was working.
This was deemed acceptable because it was in a house instead of a
college campus, the owner was a Christian, and my mother would rent a house
right down the road where I would go on weekends.
*Insert
Snoopy hyper happy dance here.*
I have to
say it again: Midwifery was one of the
absolute best things that ever happened to me.
It was like getting on jet skis after spending my whole life floating on
driftwood wherever the current took me. My training finally gave me a purpose and (shhh!)a goal to achieve. But that was okay because I was called by God to be a midwife (actually true) and midwifery was deemed intrinsically a godly calling and appropriate for stay at home girls. Whatever. It
was 1988, and I was brought into a place that had not been influenced by the teachings
of Bill Gothard or ATI, into a profession where independent adult decision
making skills by women (the midwives) were of paramount importance. Although as an apprentice I attended the
births of homeschoolers, and even some ATI families, I also attended births of
every ethnicity , Christian denomination, religion and demographic present in
the DFW area at that ime. I rubbed
shoulders with a lot of very strong independent opinionated women in an environment
where those traits were defined as good and not bad. It was a true 1980s sub-culture.
Not only that, but midwives had to study and research and think for themselves on intimate and controversial topics, and then pass that information on to clients for them to make informed decisions- that might differ from mine-but that was okay too.
But for that year and a half, from 1988-1990, I thrived.
In
conclusion, becoming a midwife was the antidote to almost every lie I had been told
about what I couldn’t and shouldn’t do up to that point. There would be other lies later, so strong that even being an independent thinking midwife wouldn't be enough inoculation to save me from believing them.Not only that, but midwives had to study and research and think for themselves on intimate and controversial topics, and then pass that information on to clients for them to make informed decisions- that might differ from mine-but that was okay too.
But for that year and a half, from 1988-1990, I thrived.
To be (further) continued…
(Sorry about dragging it out, but hey, I'm a busy working midwife and homeschooling mom, I can only write so much at once. Stay tuned, if interested. And please. Comment and tell me your story too.)
Thanks again for sharing your journey. After reading the article you linked, I'm left wondering how my parents thought any of the IBLP stuff was ok. I know they didn't embrace all of it, but how did they not see that the guy was full of nutty? I am thankful that they didn't go for more random legalism than they did. Most of it made sense with their worldview. My mom believed that a certain level of rock and roll was wrong. If it was "too rocky" she didn't like it, and she loved Gothard telling her there was a good reason for that. And there were so many hiding places for demons and/or New Age (which was really demons dressed in rainbows) in pop culture. Rainbow Brite, He-Man, Smurfs, Dungeons and Dragons, various Disney movies, Lord of the Rings, Star Wars. They continue to be consistent about getting rid of anything with a passing reference to magic, witches, or anything paranormal. (True story, my mom recently threw away the wild cards from a Crazy Eights card game because they had the word "magic" on them.) And if we couldn't be sure whether there might be demons/New Age to fear? Then it was time to apply Philippians 4:8. And if you don't think the same things are pure, right, lovely, etc., as your parents, then you are wrong.
ReplyDeleteI always forget that we basically had identical childhoods. It's sort of scary. I could have written paragraphs 5, 7, 9-11 (for example) without changing more than a couple of words. Of course we did go to a (really unpleasant) IBYC seminar when I was 13-14, and I had all the Bill Gothard books (as well as all the Christian Liberty/Abeka ones of course), so there was some influence; but as with your family, mine revelled in its eclecticism and isolationism which was of course just further proof that we were on the one true path—anyway. I'm still wordless about all this...except to say that BPD can be treated, and doesn't have to damage loved ones as well as oneself. It's too bad that our families were so entrenched in their crazy that none of them ever got help. Stopping here before I start to use really bad words and make Baby Jesus cry—much, much love to you.
ReplyDeleteOkay I'm sorry I keep leaving comments but I keep rereading as I feel strong enough and then I did go to the Homeschoolers Anonymous post and started cough-laughing as soon as I got to: "We all know that an umbrella is the best possible analogy because their thin, flammable fabric is the perfect substance with which to stop fiery darts." HILARIOUS and so painfully familiar and much needed, you have no IDEA how much good these two posts of yours are doing me....
ReplyDeleteLoving your Blog Roxanne! I also have one. I'm going to read the whole thing.... Blessings to you.
ReplyDeleteExcepting your father being an alcoholic, and the slight difference in birth years (4)...our stories are quite similar. Thank you for sharing your story.
ReplyDeleteOut of curiosity, did you train at Helen Jolly's birth center in Grand Prairie?
Yes, I did- and thank goodness!
DeleteI still struggle with figuring out how to be a Christian, years after leaving a church that was influenced by a lot of what you're talking about.
ReplyDeleteI want so much to be better than that in my own dealings with others. In my country, people look to me to see what Christianity is all about, and it scares me to recognize pieces of what you are saying in my background and in myself.
You could continue on with the story please. I was curious to find out more and more.
ReplyDelete